High Court Refused To Hear McCloskeys “Law License Case”

The court of appeals has rejected Mark McCloskey’s request and Patricia McCloskey’s request. They are seeking to overturn a decision that they had to give up their law licenses and go back to private practice under the name of McCloskey & Harriger. Since the beginning of last year, the case was referred to the appeals court, and it is returning to the bench on Monday.

The court was unable to hear an appeal on Monday. the supreme court denied a request in an instance that might have had a significant influence on property rights and judges’ authority. In a unanimous decision, justices declared that their court did not have the power to look into the McCloskeys law license.

Mark, Along With Patricia McCloskey’s Career

They said that the McCloskeys had a right to challenge their claims to practice law following their suspension from law practice in October 2006 and that they could have appealed the disbarment before the court of the state. The Supreme Court had denied the appeal of Mark McCloskey and Patricia McCloskey, who lost their law licenses when they pointed guns at racial discrimination protesters.

High Court Refused To Hear McCloskeys Law License Case

The McCloskeys are part of the “civil rights establishment,” the predominantly white male group comprising lawyers, bureaucrats, and academic experts who were on the frontline in the struggle for civil rights throughout the 1960s. Their network was discovered by infiltrators from the Communist Party, which paved the way for the FBI to label them as terrorists throughout the United States and put them on the notorious “enemies” list.

Mark and Patricia McCloskey were both named attorneys in Wisconsin in 2017 following their entry into the firm in 2014. The move follows 17 years of trial and appellate expertise in federal and state courts in which the McCloskeys have concentrated on commercial and civil litigation, representing plaintiffs and defendants.

Why Was There A Motive To Protest Against Racial Injustice?

These protests, which have occurred throughout the United States over the past few weeks, have been incredibly intense and emotional. Many thousands have come out to protest the murder of a black man who was in detention by the police force, the release of the officer who shot him, and the many other racial discriminations that impact their lives. A majority of protesters are peaceful and have employed traditional methods of civil disobedience to bring attention to their cause. Some have used brutal and intimidating tactics to disperse the protests.

On the 19th day of August in 2019, thousands of people all over America America the United States protested. The protests took place in cities such as New York, Atlanta, and Memphis and protested against the brutality committed by law officers.

The demonstrations were staged through social media platforms such as Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter and were notable for their diverse ethnic composition. The protesters, ranging from black to white to Hispanic, joined in unity to condemn the brutality of the police and the injustices racialized.


In McCloskey v. Mark and Patricia McCloskey case declared that it was in breach of Section 2. of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to refuse to issue an attorney license on the basis that the applicant didn’t meet the character requirements for an applicant who had previously been denied a license to practice law before applying for it again. This ruling ended McCloskey’s long-running battle to overturn their McCloskey decision.

Expert Legal Review

Expert Legal Review is the world’s first tailor-cut magazine that is all about the legal profession and its intricacies made with a core aim of shaping the playground for future generations. The magazine is dedicated to equipping both student and practicing lawyers with suitable information in the dynamic world of law.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button